Law firm Crowell faces disqualification bid in AI lawsuit

Advertisement

Brief Summary

In the latest round of the legal cage match over AI training data, art community DeviantArt is now throwing haymakers at the law firm representing its accuser. The gallery is demanding a federal judge disqualify Crowell & Moring from representing photographer Evox, alleging the firm is a two-timing double agent. Specifically, DeviantArt claims Crowell counseled its parent company, Wix.com, on AI lawsuits, regulations, and even the inner workings of its DreamUp image generator between 2022 and 2024 — all while later turning around to sue them on behalf of Evox for copyright infringement.

Why This Matters

This isn’t just petty law-firm squabbling; it's a warning shot to anyone playing fast and loose with attorney-client loyalty. For the broader public, this is a peek behind the curtain at the messy, hypocritical web of conflicts that underpins the booming AI industry, where everyone is suing everyone over who fed what data to the machines. More practically, if you’re a company dealing with AI, this is a reminder that 'we haven't billed you lately' doesn't mean your lawyer isn't pulling info from your files to use against you. It’s a trust issue, and in a sector where intellectual property is the only currency, losing your legal confidant to the other side is a corporate nightmare with a very expensive price tag.

Advertisement