SCOTUS slams door on Dem judge's career fight after years of pro-Biden Facebook posts
- Supreme Court tosses appeal from Philadelphia Judge Mark Cohen after he was canned for obsessive pro-Biden Facebook posting.
- Cohen claimed his First Amendment rights were violated, but the court wasn't buying the 'partisan cheerleading' defense.
- The former judge lost his pension after refusing to stop posting despite warnings to keep his political opinions off the clock.
- Pennsylvania's top court ruled the sheer volume of his social media activity shattered any illusion of judicial impartiality.
Brief Summary
The Supreme Court has effectively ended the career of former Philadelphia Judge Mark Cohen, refusing to hear his appeal after he was stripped of his position and pension for a relentless barrage of partisan social media posts. Cohen, a former Democratic lawmaker turned judge, used his Facebook account to fawn over Joe Biden's policies and brag about his 'F' rating from the NRA, despite being warned that his digital soapbox was incompatible with his role on the bench.
Why This Matters
This ruling serves as a blunt reminder that the robe comes with a gag order. When you walk into a courtroom, you have a right to expect the person behind the bench isn't using their free time to audition for a political pundit gig. By refusing to intervene, the Supreme Court is signaling that judicial neutrality isn't just a suggestion—it's a requirement for keeping your seat and your paycheck. Expect this to set a strict precedent for officials who think their personal social media feeds are protected spaces for partisan activism.