FAA: Musk's flying car not our responsibility

Advertisement

Brief Summary

In a move that will surely end well, the Federal Aviation Administration has declared that Elon Musk's new flying Tesla Roadster is not its problem because, shockingly, the vehicle doesn't meet the 'definition of an aircraft.' So, a car with rocket thrusters will zoom over highways without any federal aviation certification, while local traffic cops presumably scratch their heads about how to write a ticket for 500 feet of unlawful lane-sharing. The demo, which looked like a rejected 'Fast & Furious' stunt, had the thing hovering over actual traffic, because nothing says safety like rocket propulsion in a school zone. With production slated for 2028, the FAA is basically saying 'not it' and kicking the can to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, which is probably updating its crash-test dummies to withstand vertical impacts. This leaves a regulatory black hole where the only rules are whatever physics allows and whatever Musk's lawyers can argue.

Why This Matters

This announcement officially opens the 'What the hell do we do with flying cars?' era, and the answer is apparently 'nothing.' For the average reader, this means the next 80,000-pound luxury status symbol will be able to buzz your house at hover-height without a single federal airspace permit, leaving you to deal with the noise, the debris, and the insurance nightmare when it inevitably lands on your SUV. It also signals that the regulatory agencies responsible for keeping the skies safe are either woefully underprepared or creatively interpreting their own rules to avoid tangling with Musk — which should inspire immense confidence in your next cross-country flight. Beyond the personal hazard, this sets a precedent that any billionaire with a screwdriver and a dream can build a rocket-powered novelty, call it a 'car,' and sidestep decades of aviation safety bureaucracy, effectively turning the heavens into a VIP lane for the hyper-rich.

Advertisement