Harris 'installed Soviet style' in 2024, Democrats don't want her in 2028: Concha
- Joe Concha, a Washington Examiner columnist, called Kamala Harris a 'human Chernobyl' while on Fox News' 'Fox & Friends First.'
- He slammed Harris's 2024 campaign as 'installed Soviet style,' claiming Democrats want no part of her in 2028.
- The critique came as Harris embarks on an expanded post-election tour to rebuild her political brand.
- Concha's comments are dripping with the kind of hyperbole that makes cable news segments both entertaining and deeply unserious.
- The Examiner's paywall seems more aggressively enforced than any Soviet-era travel ban, judging by this article.
Brief Summary
In a stunning display of political commentary that could only be born on Fox News, Joe Concha has declared Kamala Harris a 'human Chernobyl' and accused the Democrats of installing her 'Soviet style' in 2024. He's betting the party doesn't want her anywhere near the 2028 nomination, which is a bold take from a guy whose primary expertise seems to be generating clickbait headlines. Concha's radiation metaphor is a bit sloppy—Chernobyl was a disaster, sure, but at least it was an accident, unlike this segment, which was a deliberate act of televised punditry. The real tragedy here isn't Harris's political future; it's that we're still giving airtime to people who unironically use 'human Chernobyl' in a sentence about a politician who lost an election. In the grand scheme of things, this is less a news story and more a reminder that cable news will say absolutely anything to fill a void between ads for reverse mortgages and erectile dysfunction pills.
Why This Matters
For the average voter, this is a masterclass in how political discourse has devolved into wrestling-style promo cuts. Concha isn't interested in policy or governance; he's interested in scoring rhetorical cheap shots against a figure Democrats have already mostly written off. It's a circle jerk of outrage where everyone pretends Harris's every move is a catastrophic meltdown, despite the fact she's simply doing what every defeated politician does: trying to stay relevant. The 'Soviet style' claim is particularly laughable, given that our own political machine runs on donor money, not central planning. If anything, Harris's campaign was closer to a poorly managed startup than a five-year plan from the Kremlin.