Kamala's 'weird' world

Advertisement

Brief Summary

In a stunning display of political amnesia, Kamala Harris is resurrecting FDR's failed 1937 court-packing scheme, claiming the Constitution needs 'reinforcement'—which translates to stacking nine seats until they lean her way. The 'New Kamala' pitch is a mirage; she's recycling the same radical progressive wishlist that cratered her 2024 bid: court expansion, D.C. and Puerto Rico statehood, and letting 16-year-olds vote. Her advisers call these 'groundbreaking,' but the only ground broken is the one under the Democratic platform's crumbling foundation. The cruel irony is that Harris now faces the 'weird' label she once wielded like a cudgel; three months after the media crowned 'weird' kryptonite, Trump was back in the Oval Office. With voters overwhelmingly opposing transgender athletes in girls' sports, Harris's refusal to take a simple stand remains her Achilles' heel.

Why This Matters

For the average reader, this isn't just beltway gossip—Harris's court-packing threat is a direct assault on the institutional guardrails that keep America from becoming a banana republic where every election gets nine new judges. It's a reminder that the 'progressive' agenda is less about justice and more about rigging the game permanently; you should care because her D.C. statehood push means two new Senators who'd rubber-stamp a liberal judiciary for generations. But here's the personal kicker: her 'weird' word problem is a mirror into how 'Democrats have become the party of pushing fringe ideologies down your throat, from pronoun policing to biological boys in locker rooms. If she can't stop talking like a gender-studies professor and start sounding like a normal person, the last laugh will be on her—and on anyone who believes the 'New Kamala' is anything but the same old progressive parlor trick.

Advertisement