Chinese man hosts wedding and ex's baby banquet at same venue on same day

Wu Linfeng marries Kong Sihan on first floor, celebrates 100-day son with ex Lin Si on second floor of same restaurant on same day.
Guests clash, cops called; both events proceed as scheduled, payments settled on both contracts.
State investigation confirms Wu only legally wedded Kong; no bigamy charges, but civil liability looms over support for out-of-wedlock child.
Viral videos show posters celebrating '1,314 days' of Wu and Lin's union, undercutting the wedding theme below.
Wu allegedly owes ex 100,000 yuan ($15k) amid financial dispute, authorities confirm.
summary
Welcome to the wedding hall of Horrors in Liupanshui, where groom Wu Linfeng decided to consolidate his relationship expenses and celebrate his new marriage and his parental accomplishments under one roof. While he pledged his life to Kong Sihan in a first-floor ceremony, the second floor was hosting a 100-day party for his son with, Lin Si, the ex-girlfriend who apparently hasn't fully exited the building.
Forget 'two timing', this is 'double flooring'—a logistical nightmare that has police calling for mediation and social media calling for a screenplay. Legal experts sigh and clarify this isn't bigamy, technically, because Wu only legally registered with Kong. But the optics of a split-level celebration, where one woman's 'I do' meets another's 'baby's first bendy straw,' is a masterpiece of American-style divorce turned into a Chinese buffet of betrayal.
The public fury isn't about the legalism; it's about the mundane chutzpah of a man who thought a building could contain two different timelines of his life without a dimensional rift. As the old saying goes, 'You can't have your cake and eat it too'—unless you rent out the second floor for the cake's christening.

Brief Summary

A man in Guizhou province attempts a boundary-pushing event: marrying one woman while celebrating a child with another, same venue, same day. Wu Linfeng's run showed no bigamy legally, but his civil liabilities and moral bankruptcy are now under the spotlight. Guests clashed, police stepped in, and the internet has redefined what 'wedding crashers' truly means.

Why This Matters

This story serves as a cautionary tale for anyone tempted to optimize their personal life like a supply chain. It underscores that while the legal system has boundaries, public sentiment does not—and that 'efficiency' in genealogy is not a virtue. For the average reader, it's a reminder that your ex and your new spouse may not want brunch at the same table, let alone the same building.