Top anti-Israel PAC donor is collecting Sharia law tithe
- Nazar Khan, president of New York Zakat Inc., funneled $250K into American Priorities, a super PAC backing anti-Israel and Muslim candidates.
- The donation vaults him into the group's top 10 individual bankrollers, effectively mixing religious tithe with political hardball.
- Critics note the irony: a Sharia-mandated charity tax funding a U.S. election committee is a match made in campaign finance hell.
- American Priorities positions itself as the counterweight to AIPAC, but its donor roll now reads like a holy ledger.
- No word yet on whether the IRS considers zakat a tax-deductible 'offering' or just a very motivated contribution.
Brief Summary
In a stunning display of divine diversification, the president of New York Zakat Inc., Nazar Khan, has decided that Allah's will and American campaign finance laws can be best served by the same checkbook. Khan dropped a cool quarter-million into American Priorities, a super PAC that sprouted up specifically to knock AIPAC's teeth in and boost Muslim or pro-Palestinian candidates. That makes him a top-tier sugar daddy for a group whose entire raison d'être is to counter the pro-Israel lobby's iron grip on Capitol Hill. The twist? Khan's day job is collecting zakat—the obligatory alms tax under Sharia law—which is meant for the poor and needy, not for attack ads. One assumes the 'needy' in this case refers to certain politicians starved for campaign cash. The obvious tension here is that a religious mandate to purify wealth is now being weaponized to purify Congress of Israel-friendly incumbents. It's a beautiful, cynical mess that blends theology, geopolitics, and dark money into one tidy headline.
Why This Matters
For the average reader, this is not just a story about one guy with deep pockets and a holy grudge. It’s a glaring example of how money is becoming more openly tribal in U.S. elections, with donors laundering their cultural and religious loyalties through super PACs like laundry at a parish fundraiser. If you vote, you should care that a PAC can claim to represent 'American priorities' while its funding source is a religious tax collection scheme straight out of the medieval caliphate—not exactly the Fourth of July. This also normalizes a scary precedent: when foreign or theological obligations fund domestic political machinery, the line between church, state, and swamp gets dangerously blurry. For Jewish voters or pro-Israel observers, this confirms their worst fears about an organized pushback financed by unregulated cash. For everyone else, it’s a reminder that campaign finance 'reform' is a joke, and the punchline is written in Arabic numerals. The real takeaway? Your vote is now a battleground between zakat and shekels, and you're just the guy holding the popcorn.