The Israel genocide lie: Deception by design
- Oct. 7 atrocities detailed as 'barbaric,' yet Israel faces the genocide label—a classic propaganda switcheroo.
- Nobel committee takes a credibility hit by honoring a UN rapporteur who called Israel genocidal; Free Press calls it 'The Death of the Nobel Peace Prize.'
- Media complicity cited as the vehicle for the 'blood libel'—the oldest lie in the book gets a modern makeover.
- UN institutions, once guardians of human rights, now look like a kangaroo court for Jewish statehood.
- The 'lie' isn't just spin; it's a strategic cover-up to deflect from Hamas's own body count.
Brief Summary
In a stunning Orwellian twist, the side that filmed itself committing mass murder, mutilation, and arson attacks are running a PR campaign claiming the victims are the actual monsters. The article asserts the 'genocide' charge against Israel is a deliberate Hamas psy-op, designed to flip the script on who the real barbarians are. Complicity extends to global media and the UN, with Navi Pillay's Nobel Peace Prize being the latest absurdity in this theater of the absurd. It's not just a lie; it's a strategic weapon deployed to erase the savagery of October 7th and demonize a nation's right to self-defense. The sham is so blatant that even some mainstream outlets are gagging on the hypocrisy.
Why This Matters
This directly affects your moral compass. You're being told to accept a narrative where the aggressor who filmed his crimes becomes the victim, and the victim becomes the international pariah. If this lie holds, it doesn't just endanger Israel—it teaches every terrorist group that mass murder is a great way to get global sympathy, as long as you cry 'genocide' loudly enough. It's a strategic gaslighting that, if unchallenged, redefines the very meaning of the word, rendering it useless for actual victims of extermination. Your tax dollars and social feed are being weaponized against the truth, and accepting this narrative makes you complicit in the cover-up.