The Oregonian endorses four more years of failure
- Oregon's largest paper endorses a governor whose state grapples with homelessness and drug issues, citing 'dispirited' logic.
- The editorial board can't actually articulate a clear reason for backing Kotek over the GOP challenger—because there isn't one.
- The piece reads like a hostage video: 'We support our captor because the alternative is... also our captor?'
- This is a textbook case of liberal papers backing incumbents out of habit, not performance.
- The voters are left to ask: is this an endorsement or a resignation letter?
Brief Summary
The Oregonian's editorial board, in a display of tepid loyalty, has endorsed Gov. Tina Kotek for another term, despite openly admitting their 'dispirited' state of mind. The endorsement is so lacking in enthusiasm that it reads less like a recommendation and more like a polite surrender to a known quantity. They offer no compelling rationale for why voters should re-elect Kotek over state Sen. Christine Drazan, other than the vague, unspoken dread of change. This is a prime example of a political establishment refusing to hold its own accountable, choosing instead to cling to a failed status quo out of sheer inertia. The editorial is a love letter to mediocrity, sealed with a sigh.
Why This Matters
For the average reader, this is a clarifying glimpse into the thought process of legacy media: they'd rather endorse a known failure than risk the unknown. It tells you that the political class in Oregon has no interest in fixing the streets, the housing crisis, or the drug epidemic; they just want to keep the seat warm. This endorsement, or lack thereof, should make you question every other 'recommendation' these papers make—it's not about what's good for you, it's about what's comfortable for them.