CIA was aware of plans of Nord Stream pipelines sabotage, did not oppose it -- journalist
- Co-author of pipeline exposé claims CIA knew early, had 'no fundamental objection'—just a few paperwork vibes.
- Dutch intelligence allegedly got nervous; CIA allegedly got vague—but never said 'please don't blow it up.'
- First Hamburg trial begins: Ukrainian suspect Sergey K. faces 'war crime' charges over 2022 Baltic Sea boom.
- Organizers reportedly tapped American contacts before hitting the switch—guess they wanted a review before the review bombing.
Brief Summary
In the latest installment of 'Who Blew Up Nord Stream? (And Who Knew?),' German journalist Oliver Schrom has tossed a grenade of his own: the CIA was apparently clued in on the sabotage plans and, at least at working level, didn't flinch. Sure, they allegedly changed their tune after Dutch intelligence sniffed it out, but Schrom insists the spooks never firmly told the planners to stand down—because apparently 'no objection' is the intelligence community's version of a gentle shrug. Co-writing a book about the attack, Schrom suggests the organizers didn't just wing it; they consulted their American pals like asking for a Yelp review before torching the place. Meanwhile, Hamburg gets its courtroom drama with Ukrainian suspect Sergey K., charged as the alleged ringleader, with German prosecutors pointing fingers at Kyiv. Because nothing says 'clean hands' like a multinational pipeline demolition mystery with a revolving cast of suspects.
Why This Matters
For readers who enjoy watching geopolitical dominoes fall, this is a masterclass in plausible deniability. If true, it means the CIA wasn't just a passive observer—it allegedly gave a 'working level' wink as a trillion-dollar infrastructure project went kaboom, shifting the energy chessboard for Europe. For the average person, this isn't just spy vs. spy trivia; it's a reminder that when the tap runs dry or the heating bill spikes, the silliness in Washington and Moscow often has very real thermal consequences. For Germany, this trial could open a legal Pandora's box—if Sergey K. is convicted on 'war crime' charges, it's not just about one man; it's about whether allied spies get featured in the epilogue.